protection algorithm - vertaling naar russisch
Diclib.com
Woordenboek ChatGPT
Voer een woord of zin in in een taal naar keuze 👆
Taal:

Vertaling en analyse van woorden door kunstmatige intelligentie ChatGPT

Op deze pagina kunt u een gedetailleerde analyse krijgen van een woord of zin, geproduceerd met behulp van de beste kunstmatige intelligentietechnologie tot nu toe:

  • hoe het woord wordt gebruikt
  • gebruiksfrequentie
  • het wordt vaker gebruikt in mondelinge of schriftelijke toespraken
  • opties voor woordvertaling
  • Gebruiksvoorbeelden (meerdere zinnen met vertaling)
  • etymologie

protection algorithm - vertaling naar russisch

EXTORTION SCHEME
Protection money; Protection payment; Protection payments; Krysha; Protection racketeering; Protection fees; Protection rackets

protection algorithm      
алгоритм защиты
algorithm         
  • Alan Turing's statue at [[Bletchley Park]]
  • The example-diagram of Euclid's algorithm from T.L. Heath (1908), with more detail added. Euclid does not go beyond a third measuring and gives no numerical examples. Nicomachus gives the example of 49 and 21: "I subtract the less from the greater; 28 is left; then again I subtract from this the same 21 (for this is possible); 7 is left; I subtract this from 21, 14 is left; from which I again subtract 7 (for this is possible); 7 is left, but 7 cannot be subtracted from 7." Heath comments that "The last phrase is curious, but the meaning of it is obvious enough, as also the meaning of the phrase about ending 'at one and the same number'."(Heath 1908:300).
  • "Inelegant" is a translation of Knuth's version of the algorithm with a subtraction-based remainder-loop replacing his use of division (or a "modulus" instruction). Derived from Knuth 1973:2–4. Depending on the two numbers "Inelegant" may compute the g.c.d. in fewer steps than "Elegant".
  • 1=IF test THEN GOTO step xxx}}, shown as diamond), the unconditional GOTO (rectangle), various assignment operators (rectangle), and HALT (rectangle). Nesting of these structures inside assignment-blocks results in complex diagrams (cf. Tausworthe 1977:100, 114).
  • A graphical expression of Euclid's algorithm to find the greatest common divisor for 1599 and 650
<syntaxhighlight lang="text" highlight="1,5">
 1599 = 650×2 + 299
 650 = 299×2 + 52
 299 = 52×5 + 39
 52 = 39×1 + 13
 39 = 13×3 + 0</syntaxhighlight>
SEQUENCE OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PERFORM A TASK
Algorithmically; Computer algorithm; Properties of algorithms; Algorithim; Algoritmi de Numero Indorum; Algoritmi de numero indorum; Algoritmi De Numero Indorum; Алгоритм; Algorithem; Software logic; Computer algorithms; Encoding Algorithm; Naive algorithm; Naïve algorithm; Algorithm design; Algorithm segment; Algorithmic problem; Algorythm; Rule set; Continuous algorithm; Algorithms; Software-based; Algorithmic method; Algorhthym; Algorthym; Algorhythms; Formalization of algorithms; Mathematical algorithm; Draft:GE8151 Problem Solving and Python Programming; Computational algorithms; Optimization algorithms; Algorithm classification; History of algorithms; Patented algorithms; Algorithmus
algorithm noun math. алгоритм algorithm validation - проверка правильности алгоритма
algorithmic method         
  • Alan Turing's statue at [[Bletchley Park]]
  • The example-diagram of Euclid's algorithm from T.L. Heath (1908), with more detail added. Euclid does not go beyond a third measuring and gives no numerical examples. Nicomachus gives the example of 49 and 21: "I subtract the less from the greater; 28 is left; then again I subtract from this the same 21 (for this is possible); 7 is left; I subtract this from 21, 14 is left; from which I again subtract 7 (for this is possible); 7 is left, but 7 cannot be subtracted from 7." Heath comments that "The last phrase is curious, but the meaning of it is obvious enough, as also the meaning of the phrase about ending 'at one and the same number'."(Heath 1908:300).
  • "Inelegant" is a translation of Knuth's version of the algorithm with a subtraction-based remainder-loop replacing his use of division (or a "modulus" instruction). Derived from Knuth 1973:2–4. Depending on the two numbers "Inelegant" may compute the g.c.d. in fewer steps than "Elegant".
  • 1=IF test THEN GOTO step xxx}}, shown as diamond), the unconditional GOTO (rectangle), various assignment operators (rectangle), and HALT (rectangle). Nesting of these structures inside assignment-blocks results in complex diagrams (cf. Tausworthe 1977:100, 114).
  • A graphical expression of Euclid's algorithm to find the greatest common divisor for 1599 and 650
<syntaxhighlight lang="text" highlight="1,5">
 1599 = 650×2 + 299
 650 = 299×2 + 52
 299 = 52×5 + 39
 52 = 39×1 + 13
 39 = 13×3 + 0</syntaxhighlight>
SEQUENCE OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PERFORM A TASK
Algorithmically; Computer algorithm; Properties of algorithms; Algorithim; Algoritmi de Numero Indorum; Algoritmi de numero indorum; Algoritmi De Numero Indorum; Алгоритм; Algorithem; Software logic; Computer algorithms; Encoding Algorithm; Naive algorithm; Naïve algorithm; Algorithm design; Algorithm segment; Algorithmic problem; Algorythm; Rule set; Continuous algorithm; Algorithms; Software-based; Algorithmic method; Algorhthym; Algorthym; Algorhythms; Formalization of algorithms; Mathematical algorithm; Draft:GE8151 Problem Solving and Python Programming; Computational algorithms; Optimization algorithms; Algorithm classification; History of algorithms; Patented algorithms; Algorithmus

математика

алгоритмический метод

Definitie

Euclidean Algorithm

Wikipedia

Protection racket

A protection racket is a type of racket and a scheme of organized crime perpetrated by a potentially hazardous organized crime group that generally guarantees protection outside the sanction of the law to another entity or individual from violence, robbery, ransacking, arson, vandalism, and other such threats, in exchange for payments at regular intervals. Each payment is called "protection money" or a "protection fee". Depending on strictness of the protection racket's policy, each payment is either due: once a day, once a week, or once every two weeks. An organized crime group determines an affordable or reasonable fee by negotiating with each of its payers, to ensure that each payer can pay the fee on a regular basis and on time. Protections rackets can vary in terms of their levels of sophistication or organization; it is not uncommon for their operations to emulate the structures or methods used by tax authorities within legitimate governments to collect taxes from taxpayers.

The perpetrators of a protection racket may protect vulnerable targets from other dangerous individuals and groups or may simply offer to refrain from themselves carrying out attacks on the targets, and usually both of these forms of protection are implied in the racket. Due to the frequent implication that the racketeers may contribute to harming the target upon failure to pay, the protection racket is generally considered a form of extortion. In some instances, the main potential threat to the target may be caused by the same group that offers to solve it in return for payment, but that fact may sometimes be concealed in order to ensure continual patronage and funding of the crime syndicate by the coerced party.

The protection racket sells physical security. Through the credible threat of violence, the racketeers deter both third-party criminals and people in their own criminal organization from swindling, robbing, injuring, sabotaging, or otherwise harming their clients. The racket often occurs in situations and places where criminal threats to certain businesses, entities, or individuals are not effectively prevented or addressed by the prevailing system of law and order or governance, or in cases of inadequate protection by the law for certain ethnic or socioeconomic groups. Protection rackets tend to form in markets in which the law enforcement cannot be counted on to provide legal protection, because of incompetence (as in weak, corrupt, or failed states), illegality (when the targeted entity is involved in black markets), and/or because forms of government distrust exist among the entities involved. Hence, protection rackets are common in places or territories, where criminal organizations resemble de facto authorities, or parallel governments. Sicily, Italy is a great example of this phenomenon, where the Cosa Nostra collects protection money locally and resembles a de facto authority, or a parallel government.

Protection rackets are often indistinguishable in practice from extortion rackets, and generally distinguishable from social service and private security by the degree of implied threat; the racketeers themselves may threaten and attack businesses, technological infrastructure, and citizens if the payments are not made. A distinction is possible between a "pure" extortion protection racket, in which the racketeers might agree only not to attack a business or entity, and a broader protection racket offering some real private security in addition to such extortion. In either case, the racketeers generally agree to defend a business or individual from any attack by either themselves or third parties (other criminal gangs). In reality, the distinction between the two types of protection rackets is dubious, because in either case extortion racketeers may have to defend their clients against rival gangs to maintain their profits. By corollary, criminal gangs may have to maintain control of territories (turfs), as local businesses may collapse if forced to pay for protection from too many rackets, which then hurts all parties involved.

Certain scholars, such as Diego Gambetta, classify criminal organizations engaged in protection racketeering as "mafia", as the racket is popular with both the Sicilian Mafia and Italian-American Mafia.

Vertaling van &#39protection algorithm&#39 naar Russisch